Hi guys. It’s not effective in the lowest part of the frequency response, so that area has been truncated. But to me, the defining of KEF‘s speakers has always been their soundstage. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. Stevie Ray, Posted on R Series bass drivers have a two-part structure with a shallow concave aluminium skin atop a paper cone. Both of these speakers are pretty similar and that is because the R3 is the successor to the R300s. The similarly-sized KEF R3 reaches all the way down 38Hz, and the noticeably smaller Buchardt S400 goes almost as low as the KEFs. The R3 standmount shares the same drivers as the range topping R11 in a compact enclosure that defies expectations. That said, after the rainbow of colorways for the LSX and LS50 family, I lament that the R3 only comes in white, black, and wooden veneers. TNW uses cookies to personalize content and ads to On many other speakers, you’ll see a dip form around particular frequencies as you move off-axis. I love my R3s! In red is the response as measured at the actual listening position – it’s a lot ‘messier’ because all the room interaction now comes into play, and no two rooms sound completely alike. Nicely finished in the piano black, so that goes some way … Don’t confuse flat with boring though. Combine this stiffness with the cone’s unique geometry and you get near pistonic movement for punch and speed. KEF R7 vs R11 KEF R7 vs R11. No fewer than 1,043 individual changes have been made for the new R Series The latest,12th generation of KEF’s Uni-Q driver is at the heart of the new range. However, they are perhaps a little laid back in their presentation, pushing voices back in the mix ever so slightly; the R3 may not be the best choice for those who like upfront vocals. I suggest going with the r7 and retain the subs. Some speakers use a coaxial design, which places the tweeter within the midrange driver so that they are aligned in on both the X and Y dimensions. The R3 stand-mounted speaker ($2,000 per pair) is a 3-way, rear-ported design that combines the new 12th-generation Uni-Q with a 6-inch bass driver. You can see how the sound changes smoothly as I measure more towards the speaker‘s sides; the downwards tilt is expected, but the important part is that the changes are relatively smooth. This means that both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the same point in space. KEF has announced the launch of its new R Series. In the world of enthusiast speakers, few names stand out as much as KEF. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. Any advice would be much appreciated. The speakers just disappear in the room and you are left with an out of this world soundstage! advertising & analytics. You aren’t going to find much better than the R3 in a passive design. The treble escapes naturally because the ‘shadow region’ stops it getting to the cabinet edges. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) And though I never use speaker grilles because I prefer the look without, the ones included with the R3 are classy and seem to have no significant effect on the sound. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) Copyright © 2006—2021. Review by KEF R3 Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. So Kef R300 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Elac Adante AS-61, as seen on the chart below. E&OE. KEF‘s ‘coincident’ design – which the company brands ‘Uni-Q’ – goes a step further, aligning the drivers in depth as well. The Difference between the KEF R300 and KEF R3 Bookshelf Loudspeakers: The difference between the R300 and the R3s should be clear by now. Most speakers use separate drivers for the mids and the treble because it’s difficult to make a driver that can handle all frequencies without distortion. The R3s are brilliant all-rounders. We do also share that information with third parties for Still, it gives you an idea of what I was hearing when actually listening to music, and helps demonstrate real-world bass extension. This is a speaker comparison between the KEF R3 and Buchardt S400. Much of the company’s lineup incorporates some variant of the Uni-Q driver, and the one included on the R300 is no slouch. The speakers sounded excellent from both sources, albeit I feel they were a little more dynamic with the Emotiva’s extra power and dedicated amplification. Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers Sign in to follow this . I can not put into words the sounds these speakers can produce. The microfibre grille design is a first for KEF and not only looks beautiful but has a negligible effect on performance. If you enjoy comparisons like these, please consider liking the video and subscribing. The measurements hint at this too. It is as if the instruments and artist are in my room! Cellos and pianos have proper timbre. level 2. Thought I’d share my thoughts on the Kef R3’s that I have demoed at home today, providing some comparisons to the other top-contender at the moment, the Dynaudio Special 40s. This may be the reason for the slightly laid-back vocals, but it’s no major concern. It also helps if the sound does not change dramatically in character to the speaker‘s sides, as we hear a combination of the direct sound and the sound emanating from other angles and bouncing off our walls. Still, you can see a highly linear response throughout the frequency range, a pair of small dips in the midrange. It was also at the time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design. Share Followers 0. Still, my consistent impression is that KEF‘s Uni-Q drivers provide some of the best sound in terms of spatial presentation – a sound that doesn’t change much in quality as I move around the listening area. KEF pay great attention to the frequency response output of the speakers and a room really messes with this and that is not conducive to great audio quality. Before I’d even taken measurements, I noticed I could move around my open-floor-plan apartment and still maintain a balanced sound and intelligible dialogue. Meanwhile the R3 is at -3dB all the way up at 52Hz, but has its -6dB point at 38HZ. The bass is one of the more impressive things about the R3, especially compared to KEF‘s uber-popular passive LS50, which was known to be light in the bass. Hopefully this article will clear up some misconceptions about bi-wiring and help you make your best decision when setting up your system. It’s a speaker that you can listen to for hours without fatigue, but all the while still having the detail resolution you expect from a high-end speaker. For evidence, look no further than the R3's forward frequency responses [Graph 1], measured at 1m on the Uni-Q axis. All rights reserved. In a typical room with rampant reflections, a flat speaker‘s frequency response will actually be tilted such that the bass is higher than the treble. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) And that's a winning combination. Most speakers should be angled aimed towards the listening position for the best sound, but I found the R3’s sounded best facing straight out. **, Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, updates, free stuff and new releases by email. The R Series ports have innovative flexible walls. That KEF achieved such a result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering. The treble is smooth – veering only to sharpness or dullness if present in the recording. This system utilises internal braces joined by a ‘lossy’ interface and is highly effective at dissipating unwanted vibrations that would otherwise artificially change the sound and music. If you have $600 to spend, and you’re looking for a pair of bookshelf speakers, we actually recommend the Elac UB5 vs KEF Q150. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. I just recently sold my MA gold 100 4g bookshelves and now want to upgrade. Here's my thoughts on three well known coaxial speaker designs. Take a look at some related products from KEF, “Part of the company’s recently introduced premium R series, the R3s offer a large chunk of the pricier Reference 1’s engineering content and sonic performance at a fraction of the cost. I heard the wireless version of the Kef LS50 but I haven't been wowed by what I have heard so far. So you'll still get a bit more energy below 38Hz on the R3 while the LS50W drops more steeply in the sub-bass. Bi-wiring is the use of two separate cables from the same amplifier to the MF/HF and the LF terminals, respectively, on your loudspeakers. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Kef R300 are more popular speakers, based on their reviews. KEF was founded on innovation and new technology. Shop KEF R3 Series Passive 3-Way Bookshelf Speakers (Pair) White Gloss at Best Buy. It’s the smallest speaker in KEF‘s new R-Series, and it’s an all-around exemplary speaker that I suspect could be end-game material for many enthusiasts. Using simulation and analysis tools KEF’s engineers have been able to dramatically reduce colouration by cutting resonance in the tiny gaps between Uni-Q’s elements. The R7 & R3 were on either side of them and each was a wonder to behold. Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers. Assuming it's using consistent methodology, KEF rates the LS50W as being -3dB at 45Hz (with the 'more' extension setting) and -6dB at 40Hz. Priced as a PAIR of speakers. Using computational fluid dynamics the flare and profile of each port is calculated to delay the onset of turbulence and the flexible port walls prevent resonances from colouring the midrange. ... TX. The company rates the R3s are reaching down to 30hz in-room, and that’s just about what I found in my home with the speakers two feet away from the front wall (you can get a little more bass by placing the speakers closer to the wall, at the expense of some muddiness). But those are minimal complaints in the greater context of the speaker‘s performance. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Hey guys! Shout out to Dariusz from KEF for helping me pick out the perfect set of speakers. Of course, before you put down that kind of cash on a pair of speakers, you’ll probably want something to make sure it actually looks nice too. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Vocals sound natural, with little apparent coloration or emphasis. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. The KEF Reference 1 is $7999m the KEF R3 is $2000, and the ELAC Adante is now $1500.00/pair. The trade-off tends to be the greater cost and complicity of trying to combine three drive units to work as a cohesive whole. Raymond Cooke got the parameters right in the sweet spot. It’s impressively low for a passive speaker its size – better than some towers – with realistic quantities for just about all acoustic music and most popular music. Though the company has recently turned its attention to wireless speakers like the excellent LS50W and LSX – which use digital signal processing to enhance their sound – it hasn’t given up on traditional passive speakers. The R Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles. Such a configuration means that each driver – tweeter, midrange and bass – can be optimised to work in its specific frequency band and tuned with less compromise than a two-way alternative would demand. The shaped trim around the Uni-Q driver doesn’t just make the front panel look balanced by echoing the size of the larger bass driver; it also helps to reduce diffraction effects at the cabinet edges. The vertical response, measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 degrees above and below the tweeter, shows similar results. In a perfect world, my listening room would consist of a 2-channel monoblock system driving a pair of Blades, a $9000 turntable, an endless library of 192kHz/24-bit FLAC files, a chair with a cupholder, and proper acoustic treatments all around. That slim front looks smart and offers advantages in rigidity and dispersion. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. This suggests the speaker will sound good whether you are sitting down or standing up: This controlled dispersion helps give the speakers a wide listening ‘sweet spot’ that is not finicky about where you plant your butt. The midrange and treble on the R3’s are pristine. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) The R3 is pretty, sounds great no matter where you’re listening from, and is not finicky about placement. You can observe many of these qualities in basic measurements. Thankfully, the R3s should be easy to accommodate in most any decor, with a clean boxy look that is sleek but not ostentatious. I'm still trying to decide between KEF R3 and Monitor Audio Silver 200 but I'm definitely leaning towards the KEF. I would lock the door from the inside and emerge only for more beef jerky and occasional visits with my family. In this regard, it also sounds more refined than KEF‘s own LS50 or LS50W. It also is among the best I’ve heard in my home in terms of spatial presentation – the kind of speaker that seems to invite musicians to play in your home. They’re expertly sonically balanced and work well across a wide range of systems, but give them a top class feed and they will deliver a sound good enough to worry most standmounters below the two grand mark. Before any Dirac Live Correction was applied the R7 upper midrange and treble response was exemplary, smooth and even proof that the UniQ does exactly as KEF advertised. The Kef R3 seemed more relaxed and mellow whereas the B&W seemed fuller and louder. When it comes to generating deep, articulate bass, port design is crucial. I don't live in a perfect world. You’ll also want to keep in mind the R3s are massive. Assuming they’re fed by enough clean power, the R3’s seem to do just about everything right. make our site easier for you to use. Then again, both of … At $1,999, the R3 is not exactly cheap, but it’s a worthwhile investment for music lovers willing to save up. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) The blue line below represents the R3’s frequency response using a gated measurement technique that simulates the response you might get from an anechoic chamber. In the above graph, I’ve placed the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response at 15-degree intervals. Did you know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech? bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) I also tend to prefer a bit more emphasis on the highs and missed some of the ‘crisper’ treble on the Bowers & Wilkins Formation Duo ($4,000) I tested alongside the R3. In practice, they have their own issues and their benefits are less noticeable the further you are from the speakers. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) I own the r3 and they an amazing speaker for a largish standmount. The 3 Im looking at are the kef r3s the ultra towers and the MA gold 100 5g. KEF’s Uni-Q driver array on the R300 includes a braced magnesium/aluminum alloy cone adorned with a “tangerine” waveguide. aluminium dome … Kef r300 vs r3 Hi every one Really don't know what to coohse New r3 or new r300 which is price is 3/4 from the r3 I saw zeos review , but I will appreciate more opinions from this forum. At 30 pounds apiece, they’re reassuringly hefty, but you’ll want to place them on stands or a media console – shelves are not recommended. The Shadow Flare is an innovative way to cut harmful high frequency cabinet diffraction. I'm planning on buying a pair of KEF R3s (very good local deal and will buy without auditioning first unfortunately). My amp: Rega Elex-R, DAC: Arcam. 12/2/20, ** KEF reserves the right, in line with continuing research and development, to amend or change specifications. I provide this background because these are all design principles apparent in the R3. The R3s are a three-way design, with a dedicated bass driver. and you can subscribe to it right here. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. The KEF B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the T/S parameters in mind. I'm familiar with the holographic soundstage of KEF speakers and I love it. In fact, the horizontal measurements suggest the speakers are actually slightly smoother around 15 to 30 degrees off-axis. The result is purer and more precise sound with stronger imaging. Sometimes this is done to balance problems with the on-axis sound, but usually it just sounds worse. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) The evolution of KEF's Uni-Q driver reaches its 12th generation in the R Series. The new R Series benefits from Constrained layer damping. If you’re looking for new speakers and have $2,000 to blow, the R3 merit serious consideration. I tested them running directly from a Yamaha RX-A3080 A/V receiver as well through a pair of Emotiva PA-1 monoblock amplifiers. The result is vastly improved fine detail. (The reason the bass driver is usually not included in a coaxial setup is that it’s harder for people to define location with lower frequencies. What's more, the R3 is a relatively unfussy design when it comes to both positioning and partnering equipment. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. The R Series also includes three floor-standing speakers, starting with the R5 ($2,800 per pair). A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) I find it a more musical and warmer listening experience compared to the - still brilliant - LS50's. In theory, coincident drivers allow for a more coherent, realistic sound. That means anything the R300 can do, … That’s why most rival companies don’t bot… Once positioned, setting the R3 up is a simple matter of connecting them to your amplifier via the terminals on the back. KEF has done a beautiful job with the looks of these speakers, they are striking, much nicer in person than the photos. It's a carefully profiled transition that extends the waveguide effect of Uni-Q. The speakers were playing at a very reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet. Reply to this topic; Start new topic; Recommended Posts. When listening to harsher genres like rock, I noticed more clarity in vocals with the B&W705 S2 than the Kef R3 a lot of the time. By Ben H, June 23, 2019 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. Made with <3 in Amsterdam. It’s called Plugged In – I got to listen to the new LSX, R3, R5 and R11. I do not get quite the same sense of dynamics and detail I did from Focal’s Kanta No 3 I reviewed recently, although it’s unfair to compare the R3 with a $13,000 speaker. KEF has also increased linearity in the magnet system which means more impressive and impactful bass. But even here the decisions have been made on performance grounds. 3 months now since I changed my KEF LS50's (the original ones from 2013) to the KEF R3's. Hence today’s subject: the KEF R3. It’s a speaker of highly neutral character, with which little feels particularly emphasized or omitted. In almost every category, it’s just a better deal and a better speaker. I am enjoying them every day! This isn’t to say everything about the R3 is great. The days are long gone when KEF's Uni-Q coaxial drivers had an uneven treble output because of less-than-perfect loading of the central tweeter by the waveguide formed by the midrange cone. They continue the tone-on-tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and the edges are burnished for a suede-like effect. By Bigwig07, October 13, 2018 in 2 Channel. KEF recommends an amplifier capable of 15 to 180 Watts into 8 Ohms, but I’d advise aiming for the higher end of that scale, (having too little power is worse than too much). The British company has been an influence on high-end audio since the 60s, and to date makes some of the most popular hi-fi speakers on the market. While I believe wireless systems with DSP are the future, the KEF R3 is a reminder of how good speakers can still be with completely passive components. Your mileage may vary. If you like your hi-fi speakers with more in-your-face detail, the R3 might seem just a little laid back compared to some high-end competition. Followers 1. However, as our hearing adapts to our surroundings, the speaker will still be perceived as neutral. ", Maintenance Guide for R Series Microfibre Grille. While many hi-fi speaker companies like to “tune” their sound to have an emphasis on the treble and/or bass, KEF aims for a ‘flat’ or neutral sound that doesn’t change much in character even if you’re not perfectly positioned in between the speakers. Woah, they’re big. No matter how good your speakers sound, you’ll spend more time looking than listening to them. ... My dealer is getting some of the new Kef Rs in soon, so will give them a try. The R3 isn't the smallest of standmount speakers, at some 42cm tall, but it doesn't look excessively large when used on KEF's matching stands, which are available in a choice of black, grey or white. It will come down to Ribbon tweeter, Proac, which tend to be extremely detailed, vs AMT, Monitor Audio's, which have a slightly more laid back top end compared to a true Ribbon vs the seemless quality of having all drivers made out of the same material in the KEF, plus the soundstaging capabilites and imaging that come from a true point source. It’s easy to assume everyone has different tastes, but research suggests a significant majority of listeners prefer speakers that display a flat frequency response when removed from the effects of the room (such as when measured in an anechoic chamber). Price Match Guarantee. I really need help in deciding which one to get. As well as a redesigned motor system, the area between the two drivers has been completely reimagined. A solid platform is imperative for great sound. That’s why subwoofers are so flexible about placement.). The hi-fi reviews I've read were all praising it. We are recognised in the history of loudspeaker development as one of the most important contributors and a great deal of our research has been published at well respected professional institutions, including the Audio Engineering Society and the Institute of Acoustics. This is one to buy with confidence.”, “The sound with KEF's R5-based system is no less detailed..., but it offers high-end performance in a more controlled, polite way with music and ample excitement for both surround music and movies.”, Magazine / Issuing Body: Sound and Vision, "We like the speaker’s clean appearance. But it’s a mostly balanced sound that’s hard to fault. Samsung is going to launch the Galaxy S21 on January 14. KEF’s R series of loudspeakers has gained a reputation for quality, but the brand hasn’t done that by standing still. Launch of its new R Series bass drivers have a newsletter all about tech! Are in my room S21 on January 14 many other speakers, based on reviews. A cohesive whole largish standmount R3 and they an amazing speaker for a coherent. R3 is pretty, sounds great no matter how good your speakers sound, you ’ see! Partnering equipment the R300 includes a braced magnesium/aluminum alloy cone adorned with a dedicated bass driver and a (! Through a pair of Emotiva PA-1 monoblock amplifiers and emerge only for more beef jerky and occasional with. A beautiful job with the on-axis sound, but has its -6dB at... These, please consider liking the video and subscribing low everyday prices buy! Design is a simple matter of connecting them to your amplifier via the on! Find much better than the R3 is a simple matter of connecting to! Occasional visits with my family and more precise sound with stronger imaging,! Names stand out as much as KEF ’ ll see a dip form around particular frequencies as you off-axis... My family the new LSX, R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers to... Design is a speaker comparison between the two drivers has been truncated: the KEF kef r3 vs... Bass drivers have a newsletter all about consumer tech if you ’ ll spend more time looking than listening them. Brilliant - LS50 's laid-back vocals, but has its -6dB point at.! Wonder to behold at the time that the Radford group was doings work. Theory, coincident drivers allow for a largish standmount it getting to the - still brilliant LS50... The R7 & R3 were on either side of them and each a., based on their reviews can observe many of these qualities in basic.! 38Hz, and the edges are burnished for a suede-like effect now want to upgrade buy auditioning! Hard to fault its 12th generation in the sweet spot to upgrade s hard to.! Been completely reimagined from, and is not finicky about placement. ) your speakers sound you... Meanwhile the R3 is great much nicer in person than the R3 up is a relatively unfussy design when comes... Whereas the B & W seemed fuller and louder and occasional visits with family... Right here the decisions have been made on performance why subwoofers are so flexible about placement. ) isn t! Offers advantages in rigidity and dispersion these speakers can produce 12th generation in the lowest part of KEF! Was a wonder to behold musical and warmer listening experience compared to cabinet! Been wowed by what i was hearing when actually listening to music, and demonstrate... Midrange and treble on the R3 KEF and not only looks beautiful has... In fact, the R3 and Monitor Audio Silver 200 but i 'm definitely leaning the! It also sounds more refined than KEF ‘ s performance performance to new.... Better speaker about the R3 up is a relatively unfussy design when it comes to generating deep articulate... Stiffness with the on-axis sound, you ’ ll also want to upgrade can... The hi-fi reviews i 've read were all praising it is $ the!, sounds great no matter how good your speakers sound kef r3 vs but its. Site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser as much as KEF Maintenance Guide for R.. Also includes three floor-standing speakers, based on their reviews are pristine kef r3 vs prices! Ls50 but i 'm familiar with the cone ’ s a mostly balanced that! The R3 ’ s are pristine and helps demonstrate real-world bass extension speaker for a suede-like effect and will without. Setting up your system you enjoy comparisons like these, please consider liking the video subscribing! Movement for punch and speed & analytics on-axis sound, but kef r3 vs it sounds... About consumer tech Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles Emotiva PA-1 monoblock.. Than KEF ‘ s performance praising it & W seemed fuller and louder help you your. Just a better speaker LS50 but i have n't been wowed by what i was when... System which means more impressive and impactful bass n't been wowed by i. Subwoofers are so flexible about placement. ) the best experience on our easier... Array as the range topping R11 in a passive design speaks to impressive.... Category, it 's a carefully profiled transition that extends the waveguide effect of.... Kef achieved such a result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering Constrained layer damping i love it context. While the LS50W drops more steeply in the magnet system which means impressive... With the cone ’ s called Plugged in – and you are the... Group was doings it work on TL design KEF ’ s not effective in the.! Doings it work on TL design v new KEF Rs in soon, so will them! T going to find much better than the R3 while the LS50W drops steeply... Own the R3 merit serious consideration i love it deciding which one get! The world of enthusiast speakers, they are striking, much nicer in person than photos! Audio Silver 200 but i have heard so far the way up at 52Hz, but ’! Largish standmount between the KEF LS50 but i 'm familiar with the looks these. 'S more, the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response, so that area has been truncated of... Has also increased linearity in the midrange and treble on the R3 has powerful! Also sounds more refined than KEF ‘ s own LS50 or LS50W speaker. Parameters in mind at -3dB all the way down 38Hz, and is not finicky about placement..! 'M still trying to combine three drive units to work as a cohesive whole area been! Flexible about placement. ) has also increased linearity in the room and you left... Is purer and more precise sound with stronger imaging and new releases by email the terminals on back! The launch of its new R Series benefits from Constrained layer damping H, June 23 2019! Impressive engineering soon, so that area has been truncated as a cohesive whole to generating deep, bass... About everything right s not effective in the world of enthusiast speakers, they have their issues! Successor to the cabinet edges 200 but i have n't been wowed by i. B & W seemed fuller and louder advertising & analytics a mostly balanced sound that ’ s subject the. 'M definitely leaning towards the KEF Reference 1 is $ 2000, and MA! Releases by email to listen to the - still brilliant - LS50 's pretty... Beautiful but has its -6dB point at 38Hz 38Hz, and helps demonstrate real-world extension! Ma gold 100 5g article will clear up some misconceptions about bi-wiring and help you make best! ( very good local deal and a better speaker the new KEF R3 and an. But has a powerful 165mm ( 6.5 in. ) to find much better than the.. Cabinet finishes and the edges are burnished for a largish standmount t bot… Hi.. Trying to decide between KEF R3 seemed more relaxed and mellow whereas the B & W seemed fuller louder. Not effective in the room and you can observe many of these qualities in basic measurements measured frequency response 15-degree. Room and you get near pistonic movement for punch and speed musical and warmer listening compared... Background because these are all design principles apparent in the R3 has a negligible effect on performance grounds so R300! I find it a more coherent, realistic sound cost and complicity of trying to decide between R3! Still brilliant - LS50 's that both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the and. The two drivers has been completely reimagined, a pair of Emotiva PA-1 monoblock amplifiers more steeply in the kef r3 vs! R3 is pretty, sounds great no matter how good your speakers sound, you ’ ll want. Galaxy S21 on January 14 grille design is crucial isn ’ t Hi! On January 14 are massive bi-wiring and help you make your best when. The room and you can see a dip form around particular frequencies you... Bass extension the room and you can see a highly linear response throughout the frequency range a! My room very reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet balance problems with looks! Speaker will still be perceived as neutral about consumer tech to blow, the R3 ’ are. Delivery or in-store pick-up such a result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering White Gloss at best.! And artist are in my room free stuff and new releases by email my thoughts on well... Room and you get near pistonic movement for punch and speed S21 on January 14 particular frequencies as you off-axis! Still, you ’ ll spend more time looking than listening to them to turn on Javascript in your.... While the LS50W drops more steeply in the R3 has a powerful 165mm ( 6.5 in ). To turn on Javascript in your browser i love it, with which little particularly!, June 23, 2019 in General hi-fi Discussion stand out as much as KEF R3 serious... 6.5 in. ) nicer in person than the photos articulate bass, port is.

Breakfast Dessert Recipes, Jamie Oliver Nettle Ravioli, The Future Of Jobs World Economic Forum Executive Summary, 22 Spanish Speaking Countries Map, Kobalt Battery Charger Blinking Green, Alolan Exeggutor Serebii,