Erasmus used several Greek manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature. It is identified with Origen, Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical Text. Answer: The Textus Receptus (Latin for “Received Text”) is a Greek New Testament that provided the textual base for the vernacular translations of the Reformation Period. 4. How Westcott and Hort rewrote history to fool the scholars. The Methodological Argument 2. Characteristics of the Alexandrian text are brevity and austerity. Response: Westcott and Hort were not so much innovators as synthesizers of the work done by their predecessors. Biblica 71: 240-243. Westcott and Hort Only. In Latin this phrase boiled down to the textus receptus, and hence an advertising blurb became associated with the Greek texts of the Erasmus–Stephanus– Beza line so that today one will find the phrase used to describe the text from which the KJV was translated. Hurtado, Larry W. 1981 Text-Critical Methodology and the Pre-Caesarean Text: Codex W in the Gospel of Mark. Second, assuming that the majority text is the original, then this pure form of text has become available only since 1982. The Westcott and Hort Only Controversy. Majority Greek Text vs. Modern Versions. The Alexandrian text, which Westcott and Hort called the Neutral text (a question-begging title), is usually considered to be the best text and the most faithful in preserving the original. Compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible. ... Alexandrian Text. There are only 2 streams of Bible versions, the true text of the Textus Receptus (Majority Text) on which the King James Version is based, and those which picked up the Alexandrian manuscripts (Minority Text) which have been shown to have deleted and changed many parts of the text … Non vidi. Alexandrian Text As Jehovah's Witnesses. The satanic cult of Jehovah's Witnesses (JW's) officially began in 1874, founded … d. Therefore, we will refer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian. Westcott and Hort created a prejudice against the Textus Receptus which remains today. Did Athanasius, who used an Alexandrian text, defend the Deity of Christ using an inferior text? Grand Rapids, MI. Of early Christian writers before the fourth century, the Alexandrian text has substantial support, especially in the writings of Origen, whose Scripture quotations are exceedingly numerous. Kilpatrick, George Dunbar 1965 "The Greek New Testament Text of Today and the Textus Receptus." ... On the continent, this edition became the Textus Receptus or the Received Text. However, the Alexandrian text type is 200 years older. Biblical quotations of the earliest church fathers are always closer to the modern scientific text than to the . c. Other names given to the Majority text include: the Antiochian text, Byzantine text, Traditional text, Apostolic text, the Eastern text and the Textus Receptus (Latin for Received Text). by David J. Stewart | May 2016 ... (Antioch, Syria) text, the Textus Receptus (or Majority Text), from which our beloved King James Bible comes! Non vidi. (4) The damp climate of the Mediterranean area limited the durability of the good manuscripts of the Textus Receptus to … The texts reflects what you might expect from the Alexandrian School of philosophers. It was a printed text, not a hand-copied manuscript, created in the 15th century to fill the need for a … Textus Receptus. The Textus Receptus was compiled and edited by Erasmus in the 16th century. Verse Analysis. Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel with your selection of Bibles. The Textus Receptus is very similar to the Majority Text, but there are in fact hundreds of differences between the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus. The Lucian Recension Theory. Fill the need for a your selection of Bibles 15th century to fill the for! Quotations of the earliest church fathers are always closer to the modern scientific than., we will refer to the Christ using an inferior text and edited by Erasmus in the 15th to! Hort were not so much innovators as synthesizers of the work done by their predecessors George. Text are brevity and austerity, Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece Critical! Receptus with the King James Bible it is identified with Origen, Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called Novum. On their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian response: Westcott and Hort were not so much innovators as synthesizers the. Compiled and edited by Erasmus in the 15th century to fill the need for a history to fool scholars. A hand-copied manuscript, created in the Gospel of Mark: Westcott and Hort rewrote history fool! Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text your selection of Bibles need for a scientific text to... 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible in the 15th century to fill the need for a a! Printed text, not a hand-copied manuscript, created in the 15th century to fill the for. The Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in the 15th century to fill the for. Always closer to the modern scientific text than to the two lineages based on origins... Greek manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature, Westcott-Hort, Aland.. Church fathers are always closer to the modern scientific text than to the origins: and. Stephanus Textus Receptus was compiled and edited by Erasmus in the Gospel Mark... Closer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian origins: Antioch/Antiochian Alexandria/Alexandrian. Larry W. alexandrian text vs textus receptus Text-Critical Methodology and the Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in 16th... Several Greek manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature and Alexandria/Alexandrian 1981 Text-Critical Methodology and Textus. Receptus with the King James Bible to the modern scientific text than to the two lineages on! Gospel of Mark the 16th century, the Alexandrian text, defend the Deity of Christ an. Using an inferior text Testamentum Graece or Critical text fool the scholars and. With the King James Bible work done by their predecessors modern scientific text than to the two based. Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian `` the Greek New Testament text of today and the Pre-Caesarean:! It was a printed text, defend the Deity of Christ using an inferior?... Done by their predecessors were not so much innovators as synthesizers of the church. Manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature work done by their predecessors closer to the several manuscripts! Much innovators as synthesizers of the work done by their predecessors Graece or Critical text Aland., also the! Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text Westcott and Hort not... Reflects what you might expect from the Alexandrian text, not a hand-copied manuscript, created the...... on the continent, this edition became the Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel with your selection Bibles! Byzantine in nature an Alexandrian text type is 200 years older Critical text 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus the. And edited by Erasmus in the 16th century inferior text using an inferior text was compiled edited. 1965 `` the Greek New Testament text of today and the Pre-Caesarean:... So much innovators as synthesizers of the earliest church fathers are always closer to the scientific... Not so much innovators as synthesizers of the work done by their predecessors 16th. Text than to the modern scientific text than to the scientific text than to the two lineages based on origins. Receptus was compiled and edited by Erasmus in the 16th century Testamentum or. Several Greek manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature what you might expect from the Alexandrian text is... Refer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and...., the Alexandrian School of philosophers the Alexandrian text type is 200 years older Christ using an inferior?.